Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Thesis/ Outline Redo

Intro
-----A. Thesis – Nathanial Bacon was not a hero in his rebellion
-----B. Background


II. Bacon was a hero (They say)
-----A. Who was he a hero to?
1. The poor people, indentured servants, slaves of multiple races, lower class, farmers ect.
-----B. Why did they see him like that?
---------- 1. He was fighting against the same government that was neglecting them.
---------- ---------- a. Yellow handout, Bacons declaration
---------- ---------- ---------- i. “Raised great unjust taxes”
---------- ---------- ---------- ii. “By advancing to places of judicature scandalous and ignorant favorites”
---------- ---------- ---------- iii. “For having wronged his Majesty’s prerogative… by assuming monopoly of the beaver trade”
---------2. He fought alongside them
---------- 3. Sacrificed social status and favor with Berkeley
---------- 4. United (briefly) blacks and whites
---------- ---------- a. “But Virginias planters long remembered the spectacle of black and white acting together to challenge authority”
---------- 5. Indians did attack and kill settlers, they were not innocent.
---------- ---------- a. Letter from his wife to her sister

-----C. Did they have any other choice?
---------- 1. No, there was no one else to look to.
---------- 2. They found a leader in one of their own people, not one who was already intricately tied in the government.

-----D. Who agrees with this position?
---------- 1. Bacon
---------- ---------- a. Bacons declaration
---------- 2. Bacons Wife
---------- ---------- a. Letter to sister



Evidence - (paraphrasing quotes templates summary)



III. Bacon was not a hero (They say)
-----A. Definition of martyr-
---------- 1. A person who seeks sympathy or attention by feigning or exaggerating pain, deprivation, etc.

-----B. How he was a martyr
---------- 1. In his declaration he plays the victim
---------- ---------- a. “Judge therefore all wise and unprejudiced men… the aspersion of Traitor or Rebell”
---------- 2. He was never in the right, nor did he not have a reason for his anger
---------- 3. Was never in any grave poverty such as the people he “represented”


-----C. Attacked innocent people
---------- 2. Ignored existing peace treaties with Indians
---------- ---------- a. That jeopardized the economy from trade
---------- ---------- b. Ruined trust with surrounding Indian villages

---------- 3. Attacked Indian villages that were peaceful
---------- ---------- a. Doeg tribes ect...
---------- ---------- b. They were innocent, did not fight back even in fear they would offent the settlers.

-----D. Question, "Was he a leader, or more a character created out of desperation?"
---------- 1. He was a leader, but was he created. He was a man who could rally a crowd, assign guilt, act as arbiter.

Evidence - (paraphrasing quotes templates summary)




IV. My thoughts (I say)
-----A. Was anyone justified?
---------- 1. Indians
---------- ---------- a. They were attacked, stolen from, killed
---------- ---------- b. They did the same, usually in retaliation.
---------- 2. Settlers
---------- ---------- a. Took land that was given to them that was not really theirs
---------- ---------- b. Attacked innocent and unrelated Indian tribes

---------- 3. Government
---------- ---------- a. Refused to help outlying Settlers to protect Indian trade
---------- ---------- b. Bacon thought Berkeley was corrupt

-----B. He was not a hero (use both agree and disagree templates)
---------- 1. Agree- change was needed and he brought it.
---------- 2. Disagree- brought out colonists anger and frustrations on Indians


V. References

1 comment:

Zachary Silverton said...

I really like how much evidence you found to support your thesis, but you mind want to be wary of spending too much time on your "They say" argument. Good night and good luck.